＞◼ In other words, in the daily life of great cities, manners, etiquette, and political correctness — such as refraining from discriminatory remarks — almost invariably take precedence over constitutional or criminal law.
＞◼ This is also an expedient survival strategy for urban dwellers.
＞◼ Without prioritizing manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, metropolitan life — where one constantly brushes shoulders with innumerable strangers — could not function at all.
＞◼ Yet when viewed from the perspective of the legal order of the modern civic nation-state, grounded in the rule of law, liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, and policies of Jewish emancipation, the everyday sensibilities of great cities appear distorted and even anti-American or far-left in character.
＞◼ For in a modern civic nation-state, legality under constitutional and criminal law is ultimately more important than manners, etiquette, or political correctness.
＞◼ Put differently, urban residents who survive by employing such expedient social strategies live by implicitly entrusting people outside the great cities with upholding the global standard that they themselves conveniently suspend and ignore — namely, the rule of law and liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, including policies of Jewish emancipation.
＞◼ Therefore, residents of great cities, whose inverted daily lives prioritize manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, must humbly accept that the weight of their vote is lighter than that of people living in rural regions.”
1
0
＞◼ In other words, in the daily life of great cities, manners, etiquette, and political correctness — such as refraining from discriminatory remarks — almost invariably take precedence over constitutional or criminal law.
＞◼ This is also an expedient survival strategy for urban dwellers.
＞◼ Without prioritizing manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, metropolitan life — where one constantly brushes shoulders with innumerable strangers — could not function at all.
＞◼ Yet when viewed from the perspective of the legal order of the modern civic nation-state, grounded in the rule of law, liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, and policies of Jewish emancipation, the everyday sensibilities of great cities appear distorted and even anti-American or far-left in character.
＞◼ For in a modern civic nation-state, legality under constitutional and criminal law is ultimately more important than manners, etiquette, or political correctness.
https://gyazo.com/5c876672b7d693728719f2d53af34d66
＞◼ Put differently, urban residents who survive by employing such expedient social strategies live by implicitly entrusting people outside the great cities with upholding the global standard that they themselves conveniently suspend and ignore — namely, the rule of law and liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, including policies of Jewish emancipation.
＞◼ Therefore, residents of great cities, whose inverted daily lives prioritize manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, must humbly accept that the weight of their vote is lighter than that of people living in rural regions.”
https://gyazo.com/1fdc3273b47be3b47590a118b47950b5