『マルクス·レーニン主義の労働価値説を象徴する耕作者所有原則』



〓戦後 日本を占領した屑のアメリカ民主党政権(ハリー·トルーマン：1945〜1953)は､第1次五カ年計画(1928年〜1932年)でKulaks(富農､クラーク)を潰し､コルホーズによる集団化を強行したソ連共産党のスターリンの猿真似をして日本で農地解放を強行し､耕作者所有原則を導入､日本版コルホーズである農業協同組合による自作農の統制を押し付けた｡

https://gyazo.com/59cd8e31811ffd39f38fbd24dab434a2



＞《Google SI Overview》
＞日本の農地法における「耕作者所有原則（耕作者主義）」は、完全には廃止されていませんが、相次ぐ法改正によって大幅に緩和（「所有と経営の分離」を容認）されています。

＞戦後の農地改革の成果を維持するため、1952年に制定された農地法は「農地はその耕作者みずからが所有することを最も適当であると認める」という強い原則を掲げていました。しかし、農業従事者の減少や高齢化、耕作放棄地の増加といった課題に対応するため、近年この原則は以下のように事実上骨抜き（方向転換）にされています。

＞📌 耕作者所有原則が緩和されてきた主な経緯

＞♣2009年の農地法改正（「所有から利用へ」の転換）

＞ • 一般企業（株式会社など）による農地取得（所有）は引き続き制限されたものの、リース（貸借）による農地参入が全面的に解禁されました。これにより、自ら所有しなくても「効率的に利用できる者」であれば農業を行えるようになり、従来の「所有と経営の一致」から「所有と経営の分離」へと大きく舵が切られました。

＞♣2023年4月の改正農地法（下限面積要件の撤廃）

＞ • これまで新規就農者や企業が農地を借りる・買う際にハードルとなっていた「一定以上の面積（都府県で50アールなど）を経営しなければならない」という下限面積要件が全面的に廃止されました。これにより、規模の大小を問わず、意欲のある多様な主体が地域内外から参入しやすくなっています。

＞⚖ 廃止·緩和をめぐる主な論点

＞◤①立場
　◤②主な主張とメリット·デメリット

＞◤①規制緩和·廃止を推進する側
（経済界·効率化を重視する有識者など
　◤②メリット： 高齢化で手放される農地を企業や大規模農家が引き受け、農地集約や規模拡大（スマート農業の導入など）を進めやすくなる。耕作放棄地の解消につながる。

＞◤①慎重·反対する側
（農業団体·一部政党など）
　◤②デメリット： 企業の利潤追求や撤退リスクにより、農地が適切に維持されなくなる懸念。また、投機目的での土地買い占めや、優良農地の転用など、食料安全保障上のリスクが指摘される。

＞完全に「廃止」して企業の所有を自由化すべきという声（RIETIの提言など）は根強くありますが、現時点では「所有権」の自由化には慎重でありつつ、「利用権（貸借）」を広げる形で事実上の規制緩和が進んでいます。

〓『耕作者所有原則』だと？　上役に盲従して最低生存費で勤勉に働く無知蒙昧な無産階級こそマルクス·レーニン主義の唱える労働価値説に合致する生き方だと？　笑わせるな！

〓地主(有産·有識階級)が小作人(無知蒙昧な無産階級､すなわち福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』)に対して､何故そこまで卑屈にならなゃきゃならねんだ？

https://gyazo.com/4b32737d552b6ef24dc4133e754a1d1c

〓地主､すなわちブルジョア(有産·有識)階級には近代市民国家のリーダーとして､①ユダヤ人解放政策を含む法の支配と自由主義ブルジョア憲法､国際人権B規約の尊重·擁護や②マクロ経済の持続的成長の保護·育成という大事な務めがある｡

〓近代市民国家においては､極普通のコモディティー(農産物)を只勤勉に作ってりゃ駄賃(最低生存費)が貰える小作人(無知蒙昧な無産階級)､すなわち福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』とブルジョア(有産·有識)階級では､その社会的役割に雲泥の差がある｡

https://gyazo.com/25704ea5dc58627ba31bb4ecefc2c5b7

〓上役の出鱈目な考えに盲従して最低生存費で扱き使われるしか能の無え無知蒙昧な無産階級､すなわち福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』｡

〓そして出鱈目な考えを持った上役と言えば､水平派のジョン·リルバーンや山岳派の弁護士マクシミリアン·ロベスピエール｡

〓コイツ等は雇い主に盲従して最低生存費で勤勉に働くしか能の無え無知蒙昧な無産階級を買い被り､『物が安く手に入るのは労働者階級､無産階級の利益』と喧伝して､劣等財(安値コピー製品)の生産·分配ばかり奨励する｡

〓更にミクロ的な価格破壊とマクロ的なデフレ政策を推進し､不況を追い風とする劣等財(安値コピー製品)や極普通のコモディティー(農産物)の生産·消費ばかり奨励するから､結局 経済が旧ソ連·共産圏や『平成デフレ日本の失われた30年』のように痩せ細り､自滅する運命を辿る｡

https://gyazo.com/4b32737d552b6ef24dc4133e754a1d1c

〓そうやって経済運営に行き詰まると､ジョン·リルバーンやマクシミリアン·ロベスピエールのようなリベラル派の偽善者､クズ供は､無知蒙昧な無産階級を扇動して『国王を殺せ！』の大合唱を始めて､経済運営の行き詰まりから無知蒙昧な無産階級の目を逸らそうと悪足掻きするのが常なのである｡

＞The "Cultivator-Ownership Principle" Exemplifying the Marxist-Leninist Labor Theory of Value

＞The trash Democrat administration in the U.S. that occupied Japan after WWII (Harry S. Truman: 1945–1953) mimicked Stalin and the Soviet Communist Party—who crushed the Kulaks (wealthy farmers) during the First Five-Year Plan (1928–1932) and enforced collectivization via kolkhozes—by forcing agricultural land reform upon Japan. They introduced the cultivator-ownership principle and imposed control over owner-farmers through Agricultural Cooperatives, which served as the Japanese version of kolkhozes.

https://gyazo.com/7ed997a1963a206414ce1615063e8386



>>> 《Google SI Overview》
>>> The "cultivator-ownership principle (cultivator-first principle)" in Japan’s Agricultural Land Act has not been entirely abolished; however, through successive legislative amendments, it has been significantly relaxed (accepting the "separation of ownership and management").

>>> To preserve the achievements of post-war land reform, the Agricultural Land Act enacted in 1952 upheld the strong principle that "it is deemed most appropriate that agricultural land be owned by its actual cultivators." However, to address challenges such as the declining and aging agricultural workforce and the rise in abandoned farmland, this principle has effectively been gutted (shifted in direction) in recent years through the following steps:

>>> 📌 Key History of the Relaxation of the Cultivator-Ownership Principle

>>> ♣ 2009 Amendment to the Agricultural Land Act (Shift from "Ownership" to "Utilization")

>>> * While land acquisition (ownership) by general corporations (such as joint-stock companies) remained restricted, entry into agriculture via leasing was fully deregulated. As a result, entities capable of "efficient utilization" could engage in farming without owning the land, marking a major shift from the traditional "unity of ownership and management" to the "separation of ownership and management."

>>> ♣ April 2023 Amendment to the Agricultural Land Act (Abolition of Minimum Area Requirement)

>>> * The minimum area requirement—which previously acted as a hurdle requiring new farmers and corporations to manage a certain acreage (e.g., 50 ares in prefectures outside Hokkaido) to lease or buy farmland—was completely eliminated. This has made it easier for diverse, motivated entities, regardless of scale, to enter from both within and outside local regions.

＞ ⚖ Main Debates Surrounding Abolition and Relaxation

＞◤① Perspectives
　◤② Main Arguments, Advantages, and Disadvantages

＞◤① Proponents of Deregulation/Abolition (Business community, experts emphasizing efficiency, etc.)

　◤② Advantages: Corporations and large-scale farms can take over land surrendered due to aging, facilitating land consolidation and expansion of scale (e.g., introduction of smart agriculture). This helps eliminate abandoned farmland.

＞◤① Cautious/Opposing Sides(Agricultural organizations, certain political parties, etc.)

　◤② Disadvantages: Concerns that corporate profit-seeking and exit risks could lead to improper maintenance of farmland. Additionally, land speculation, buyout risks, and the conversion of prime farmland pose threats to food security.

>>> While voices calling for complete abolition to liberalize corporate ownership (such as proposals from RIETI) remain strong, current trends remain cautious regarding the liberalization of "ownership rights," pursuing practical deregulation primarily through expanding "use rights (leasing)."

〓"Cultivator-ownership principle," you say?　Are you claiming that the ignorant, propertyless proletariat, blindly subservient to their superiors and working diligently for bare subsistence wages, represents the ideal way of living aligned with the Marxist-Leninist labor theory of value?　 Don't make me laugh!

〓Why on earth should landlords—the property-owning, educated class—be so subservient to tenants, who are nothing more than the ignorant, propertyless proletariat (or what Master Fukuzawa Yukichi called "Gonsuke the apprentice")?

https://gyazo.com/13d574fb01bdf60d534a813dab737e76

〓Landlords, namely the bourgeois (property-owning and educated) class, as leaders of the modern civil state, carry vital duties: ① respecting and protecting the rule of law, liberal bourgeois constitutions (including Jewish emancipation policies), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); and ② protecting and fostering sustained macroeconomic growth.

〓In a modern civil state, there is a world of difference between the societal roles of the bourgeois class and tenant farmers—ignorant, propertyless proletarians ("Gonsuke the apprentice") who earn a modest pittance (bare subsistence wage) simply by diligently producing ordinary commodities (agricultural goods).
　　
〓An ignorant, propertyless proletariat capable of nothing more than being slaved away for subsistence wages while blindly obeying the absurd ideas of their superiors—that is precisely Fukuzawa’s "Gonsuke the apprentice."

https://gyazo.com/a66489c178b226fb770b69b086165aa8

〓And speaking of superiors with absurd ideas, look no further than John Lilburne of the Levellers or Maximilien Robespierre, the lawyer of the Mountain faction.

〓These figures vastly overrated the ignorant, propertyless proletariat who are good for nothing except blindly obeying employers for bare subsistence wages.

〓Promoting the notion that "cheap goods benefit the working class and proletariat," they encouraged nothing but the production and distribution of inferior goods (cheap knock-offs).

〓Furthermore, by driving micro-level price destruction and macro-level deflationary policies, they encouraged only the production and consumption of inferior goods (cheap knock-offs) and ordinary commodities (agricultural products) fueled by economic downturns. Ultimately, the economy degenerates and heads toward self-destruction—just like the former Soviet bloc and the "Three Lost Decades of Heisei Deflation in Japan."

https://gyazo.com/9711b1a0700617734c909e7fe4bf525d

〓Whenever their economic management hits a dead end in this manner, liberal hypocrites and scumbags like John Lilburne and Maximilien Robespierre invariably incite the ignorant, propertyless proletariat into a loud chorus of "Kill the King!", making a desperate attempt to divert their eyes from the collapse of economic governance.