＞◼ Life in a great city means brushing shoulders every day with countless strangers.

https://gyazo.com/a07307fcc8771dec99f4b8e09c26186e

＞◼ For example, sitting next to a stranger for two subway stops is an utterly ordinary occurrence.

＞◼ In reality, whether the person sitting beside you is a serious criminal or an upright citizen is usually not especially important in that moment.

＞◼ Even if the person were a serious criminal, if they are riding quietly and observing proper manners, one might naturally smile upon making eye contact — so long as it would not be misunderstood as expressing some special attachment.

＞◼ Still more so, if someone picks up a pen you accidentally dropped, it would be perfectly ordinary in a large city to thank them with a broad smile — without knowing they were a serious criminal, and so long as it would not be mistaken for personal attachment.

＞◼ Hardly anyone on public transportation pauses to consider whether the person whose pen they are picking up is respectable or a serious criminal.

＞◼ All the more so if the other person responds, “You’re welcome. That fashion suits you very well.”

＞◼ Such friendly exchanges are part of the esprit — the practical wisdom — of metropolitan life, allowing strangers to coexist comfortably during a crowded two-stop subway ride.

https://gyazo.com/4030b34b28bc0ae7679604d1195f2420

＞◼ In other words, in the daily life of great cities, manners, etiquette, and political correctness — such as refraining from discriminatory remarks — almost invariably take precedence over constitutional or criminal law.

＞◼ This is also an expedient survival strategy for urban dwellers.

＞◼ Without prioritizing manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, metropolitan life — where one constantly brushes shoulders with innumerable strangers — could not function at all.

＞◼ Yet when viewed from the perspective of the legal order of the modern civic nation-state, grounded in the rule of law, liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, and policies of Jewish emancipation, the everyday sensibilities of great cities appear distorted and even anti-American or far-left in character.

＞◼ For in a modern civic nation-state, legality under constitutional and criminal law is ultimately more important than manners, etiquette, or political correctness.

https://gyazo.com/5c876672b7d693728719f2d53af34d66

＞◼ Put differently, urban residents who survive by employing such expedient social strategies live by implicitly entrusting people outside the great cities with upholding the global standard that they themselves conveniently suspend and ignore — namely, the rule of law and liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, including policies of Jewish emancipation.

＞◼ Therefore, residents of great cities, whose inverted daily lives prioritize manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, must humbly accept that the weight of their vote is lighter than that of people living in rural regions.”

https://gyazo.com/1fdc3273b47be3b47590a118b47950b5

〓大都会に住めば､毎日 無数の見知らぬ人と袖擦り合って過ごすことになる｡

https://gyazo.com/a07307fcc8771dec99f4b8e09c26186e

〓例えば地下鉄で2駅先まで見知らぬ人と隣り合わせになることは日常茶飯時である｡

〓実は この時 隣の人が重罪人か真っ当な人かは余り重要でない｡

〓例え重罪人であってもマナーを守って乗車している人に対してなら､特別の感情を持っていると誤解されない範囲で､目が合った瞬間に思わず微笑んでしまうこともあるだろう｡

〓ましてや自分が落としてしまったペンを代わりに拾ってくれたりすれば､特別の感情を持っていると誤解されない範囲で(相手が重罪人だと知らずに)満面の笑顔で御礼を言うことだって大都会では極普通のことだろう｡

〓公共交通機関の中で誰かが落としたペンを拾うのに一々 落とした人は真っ当な人か重罪人かと気にする人は殆どいないのだ｡

〓逆もまた真なりである｡

〓ペンを拾ってくれた人が「どういたしまして｡素敵なファッションですね｡よく御似合いですよ」などと言って来れば尚更だ｡

〓こうした友好的な遣り取りは混雑した地下鉄の2駅間を見知らぬ人の隣りで快適に過ごすための大都会暮らしのエスプリ(知恵)である｡

https://gyazo.com/4030b34b28bc0ae7679604d1195f2420

〓つまり､ほぼ例外なく大都会の日常生活では､憲法や刑法よりもマナーやエチケット､差別発言をしないといったポリ·コレの方が幅を利かせる｡

〓それは大都会で暮らす人々の便宜的処世術でもある｡

〓憲法や刑法よりもマナーやエチケット､差別発言をしないといったポリ·コレの方を優先しなければ無数の見知らぬ人と袖擦り合って暮らす大都会生活そのものが成り立たない｡

〓だがユダヤ人解放政策を含む法の支配と自由主義ブルジョア憲法を基本とする近代市民国家の国法体系に照らせば､大都会の日常感覚は倒錯していて､反米·極左的に映る｡

〓近代市民国家においてはマナーやエチケット､ポリ·コレよりも矢張り憲法や刑法上の適法性が一番重要だからである｡

https://gyazo.com/5c876672b7d693728719f2d53af34d66

〓裏を返せば便宜的処世術を駆使して生きる大都会の人々は､自分達が便宜的に棚上げして無視しているグローバル·スタンダード､すなわちユダヤ人解放政策を含む法の支配と自由主義ブルジョア憲法の代行を大都会以外に暮らす人々に暗示的に､暗黙裡に付託して生きている｡

〓従って憲法や刑法よりもマナーやエチケット､差別発言をしないといったポリ·コレの方を優先する倒錯した日常生活を送る大都会の住民は､有権者の1票の重みが地方在住者より軽いことを謙虚に受け容れなければならないのである｡

〓東京23区や政令指定都市､ニューヨーク､ロサンゼルス､シカゴ､パリなどの大都会に住む有権者の1票の重みは､それ以外の地域に住む有権者の1／3〜1／10程度に留めるのが合理的であろう｡

https://gyazo.com/1fdc3273b47be3b47590a118b47950b5

＞◼ Life in a great city means brushing shoulders every day with countless strangers.

https://gyazo.com/a07307fcc8771dec99f4b8e09c26186e

＞◼ For example, sitting next to a stranger for two subway stops is an utterly ordinary occurrence.

＞◼ In reality, whether the person sitting beside you is a serious criminal or an upright citizen is usually not especially important in that moment.

＞◼ Even if the person were a serious criminal, if they are riding quietly and observing proper manners, one might naturally smile upon making eye contact — so long as it would not be misunderstood as expressing some special attachment.

＞◼ Still more so, if someone picks up a pen you accidentally dropped, it would be perfectly ordinary in a large city to thank them with a broad smile — without knowing they were a serious criminal, and so long as it would not be mistaken for personal attachment.

＞◼ Hardly anyone on public transportation pauses to consider whether the person whose pen they are picking up is respectable or a serious criminal.

＞◼ All the more so if the other person responds, “You’re welcome. That fashion suits you very well.”

＞◼ Such friendly exchanges are part of the esprit — the practical wisdom — of metropolitan life, allowing strangers to coexist comfortably during a crowded two-stop subway ride.

https://gyazo.com/4030b34b28bc0ae7679604d1195f2420

＞◼ In other words, in the daily life of great cities, manners, etiquette, and political correctness — such as refraining from discriminatory remarks — almost invariably take precedence over constitutional or criminal law.

＞◼ This is also an expedient survival strategy for urban dwellers.

＞◼ Without prioritizing manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, metropolitan life — where one constantly brushes shoulders with innumerable strangers — could not function at all.

＞◼ Yet when viewed from the perspective of the legal order of the modern civic nation-state, grounded in the rule of law, liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, and policies of Jewish emancipation, the everyday sensibilities of great cities appear distorted and even anti-American or far-left in character.

＞◼ For in a modern civic nation-state, legality under constitutional and criminal law is ultimately more important than manners, etiquette, or political correctness.

https://gyazo.com/5c876672b7d693728719f2d53af34d66

＞◼ Put differently, urban residents who survive by employing such expedient social strategies live by implicitly entrusting people outside the great cities with upholding the global standard that they themselves conveniently suspend and ignore — namely, the rule of law and liberal bourgeois constitutionalism, including policies of Jewish emancipation.

＞◼ Therefore, residents of great cities, whose inverted daily lives prioritize manners, etiquette, and political correctness over constitutional and criminal law, must humbly accept that the weight of their vote is lighter than that of people living in rural regions.”

＞◼ It would be rational for the voting power of residents living in major metropolitan areas — such as Tokyo’s 23 wards, Japan’s designated major cities, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Paris — to be limited to roughly one-third to one-tenth of the voting weight accorded to voters residing in other regions.

https://gyazo.com/1fdc3273b47be3b47590a118b47950b5

＞2026年2月の衆院選 1票の格差訴訟 高裁での判決言い渡し きょう2026年5月19日(火)から
2026年5月19日(火)5:19　NHK
https://news.web.nhk/newsweb/na/na-k10015124901000

＞衆議院選挙

＞1票の格差めぐる判決 ことし2026年2月の衆院選 合憲と判断 高松高裁(2026年5月19日<火>13:41)｡
.
.
.
〓大都会に住めば､毎日 無数の見知らぬ人と袖擦り合って過ごすことになる｡

https://gyazo.com/fe22945b8aecee56049635c6a5eee5a3

〓例えば地下鉄で2駅先まで見知らぬ人と隣り合わせになることは日常茶飯時である｡

〓実は この時 隣の人が重罪人か真っ当な人かは余り重要でない｡

〓例え重罪人であってもマナーを守って乗車している人に対してなら､特別の感情を持っていると誤解されない範囲で､目が合った瞬間に思わず微笑んでしまうこともあるだろう｡

〓ましてや自分が落としてしまったペンを代わりに拾ってくれたりすれば､特別の感情を持っていると誤解されない範囲で(相手が重罪人だと知らずに)満面の笑顔で御礼を言うことだって大都会では極普通のことだろう｡

〓公共交通機関の中で誰かが落としたペンを拾うのに一々 落とした人は真っ当な人か重罪人かと気にする人は殆どいないのだ｡

〓逆もまた真なりである｡

〓ペンを拾ってくれた人が「どういたしまして｡素敵なファッションですね｡よく御似合いですよ」などと言って来れば尚更だ｡

〓こうした友好的な遣り取りは混雑した地下鉄の2駅間を見知らぬ人の隣りで快適に過ごすための大都会暮らしのエスプリ(知恵)である｡

https://gyazo.com/d5833d1a7202ae41d81b43158df942c3

〓つまり､ほぼ例外なく大都会の日常生活では､憲法や刑法よりもマナーやエチケット､差別発言をしないといったポリ·コレの方が幅を利かせる｡

〓それは大都会で暮らす人々の便宜的処世術でもある｡

〓憲法や刑法よりもマナーやエチケット､差別発言をしないといったポリ·コレの方を優先しなければ無数の見知らぬ人と袖擦り合って暮らす大都会生活そのものが成り立たない｡

〓だがユダヤ人解放政策を含む法の支配と自由主義ブルジョア憲法を基本とする近代市民国家の国法体系に照らせば､大都会の日常感覚は倒錯していて､反米·極左的に映る｡

〓近代市民国家においてはマナーやエチケット､ポリ·コレよりも矢張り憲法や刑法上の適法性が一番重要だからである｡

https://gyazo.com/965a3bff0169fa0abdf39a705a4d6c80

〓ニューヨークやシカゴ､ロサンゼルス､サンフランシスコなど『屑のアメリカ民主党』の支持基盤であるアメリカの大都会は“聖域都市”と呼ばれ､上辺だけマナーを守って生き延びる無法者の天国になってしまっている｡

〓日本の東京23区や政令指定都市では罪刑法定主義に抵触しないマナー違反､ポリ·コレ違反に恣意的な刑罰を課す構成要件の曖昧な自治体の迷惑防止条例が独り歩きして､それが憲法や刑法に優越する異常事態が放置されている｡

〓大都会は無知蒙昧な無産階級の巣窟という側面も濃厚で､近代市民革命(ブルジョア革命)によって打ち立てられたグローバル·スタンダードである罪刑法定主義を無視した『人民裁判(Kangaroo court)』が横行する“特殊部落”的存在でもある｡

https://gyazo.com/06cd4ae4f031d38387027654499de356

〓裏を返せば便宜的処世術を駆使して生きる大都会の人々は､自分達が便宜的に棚上げして無視しているグローバル·スタンダード､すなわちユダヤ人解放政策を含む法の支配と自由主義ブルジョア憲法の代行を大都会以外に暮らす人々に暗示的に､暗黙裡に付託して生きている｡

〓従って憲法や刑法よりもマナーやエチケット､差別発言をしないといったポリ·コレの方を優先する倒錯した日常生活を送る大都会の住民は､有権者の1票の重みが地方在住者より軽いことを謙虚に受け容れなければならないのである｡

〓近代市民革命によって打ち立てられたグローバル·スタンダード､すなわちユダヤ人解放政策を含む法の支配と自由主義ブルジョア憲法について倒錯した考えを持つ大都会の住民が､近代市民国家の意思形成に過大な影響を及ぼすことは極めて危険である｡

〓東京23区や政令指定都市､ニューヨーク､ロサンゼルス､シカゴ､パリなどの大都会に住む有権者の1票の重みは､それ以外の地域に住む有権者の1／3〜1／10程度に留めるのが合理的であろう｡

https://gyazo.com/6742658581292f7536c064ddcaf2c12a

＞English Translation:

＞Living in a metropolis means spending your days brushing shoulders with countless strangers.

https://gyazo.com/fe22945b8aecee56049635c6a5eee5a3

＞For instance, it is a common occurrence to sit next to a stranger on the subway for a couple of stops. In these moments, it does not particularly matter whether the person beside you is a hardened criminal or a law-abiding citizen.

＞Even if they were a felon, as long as they observe proper decorum as a passenger, you might find yourself instinctively offering a brief smile upon making eye contact—within a range that wouldn't be misconstrued as having any special romantic or personal interest.

＞Furthermore, if they were to pick up a pen you dropped, it would be perfectly normal in a big city to thank them with a full smile (unaware of their criminal record), again within the bounds of avoiding misunderstanding.

＞Almost no one on public transport stops to wonder if the person who dropped a pen is a "good citizen" or a "felon" before picking it up.

＞The reverse is also true.

＞This is especially the case if the person who retrieved the pen says something like, "You’re welcome. That’s a lovely outfit; it suits you very well."

＞Such friendly exchanges are part of the esprit (wisdom) of metropolitan life, allowing one to spend time comfortably next to a stranger in a crowded subway.

https://gyazo.com/d5833d1a7202ae41d81b43158df942c3

＞In other words, in the daily life of a metropolis, manners, etiquette, and political correctness—such as refraining from discriminatory remarks—almost without exception hold more sway than the Constitution or the Penal Code. This is a practical art of living for city dwellers.

＞Without prioritizing etiquette and PC over high-level legal frameworks, metropolitan life itself—predicated on rubbing shoulders with myriad strangers—would cease to function.

＞However, when viewed through the lens of the national legal systems of modern civil states—based on the rule of law (including Jewish emancipation policies) and liberal bourgeois constitutions—this everyday metropolitan sensibility appears distorted, even anti-American or ultra-leftist.

＞This is because, in a modern civil state, the legality defined by the Constitution and the Penal Code is, after all, of paramount importance, superseding manners and political correctness.

https://gyazo.com/965a3bff0169fa0abdf39a705a4d6c80

＞Major American cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco—the power bases of the "scum" Democratic Party—are referred to as "sanctuary cities" and have devolved into heavens for outlaws who survive merely by maintaining a superficial veneer of manners.