＞ ⚖ Main Debates Surrounding Abolition and Relaxation

＞◤① Perspectives
　◤② Main Arguments, Advantages, and Disadvantages

＞◤① Proponents of Deregulation/Abolition (Business community, experts emphasizing efficiency, etc.)

　◤② Advantages: Corporations and large-scale farms can take over land surrendered due to aging, facilitating land consolidation and expansion of scale (e.g., introduction of smart agriculture). This helps eliminate abandoned farmland.

＞◤① Cautious/Opposing Sides(Agricultural organizations, certain political parties, etc.)

　◤② Disadvantages: Concerns that corporate profit-seeking and exit risks could lead to improper maintenance of farmland. Additionally, land speculation, buyout risks, and the conversion of prime farmland pose threats to food security.

>>> While voices calling for complete abolition to liberalize corporate ownership (such as proposals from RIETI) remain strong, current trends remain cautious regarding the liberalization of "ownership rights," pursuing practical deregulation primarily through expanding "use rights (leasing)."

〓"Cultivator-ownership principle," you say?　Are you claiming that the ignorant, propertyless proletariat, blindly subservient to their superiors and working diligently for bare subsistence wages, represents the ideal way of living aligned with the Marxist-Leninist labor theory of value?　 Don't make me laugh!

〓Why on earth should landlords—the property-owning, educated class—be so subservient to tenants, who are nothing more than the ignorant, propertyless proletariat (or what Master Fukuzawa Yukichi called "Gonsuke the apprentice")?

https://gyazo.com/13d574fb01bdf60d534a813dab737e76

〓Landlords, namely the bourgeois (property-owning and educated) class, as leaders of the modern civil state, carry vital duties: ① respecting and protecting the rule of law, liberal bourgeois constitutions (including Jewish emancipation policies), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); and ② protecting and fostering sustained macroeconomic growth.

〓In a modern civil state, there is a world of difference between the societal roles of the bourgeois class and tenant farmers—ignorant, propertyless proletarians ("Gonsuke the apprentice") who earn a modest pittance (bare subsistence wage) simply by diligently producing ordinary commodities (agricultural goods).
　　
〓An ignorant, propertyless proletariat capable of nothing more than being slaved away for subsistence wages while blindly obeying the absurd ideas of their superiors—that is precisely Fukuzawa’s "Gonsuke the apprentice."

https://gyazo.com/a66489c178b226fb770b69b086165aa8

〓And speaking of superiors with absurd ideas, look no further than John Lilburne of the Levellers or Maximilien Robespierre, the lawyer of the Mountain faction.

〓These figures vastly overrated the ignorant, propertyless proletariat who are good for nothing except blindly obeying employers for bare subsistence wages.

〓Promoting the notion that "cheap goods benefit the working class and proletariat," they encouraged nothing but the production and distribution of inferior goods (cheap knock-offs).

〓Furthermore, by driving micro-level price destruction and macro-level deflationary policies, they encouraged only the production and consumption of inferior goods (cheap knock-offs) and ordinary commodities (agricultural products) fueled by economic downturns. Ultimately, the economy degenerates and heads toward self-destruction—just like the former Soviet bloc and the "Three Lost Decades of Heisei Deflation in Japan."

https://gyazo.com/9711b1a0700617734c909e7fe4bf525d

〓Whenever their economic management hits a dead end in this manner, liberal hypocrites and scumbags like John Lilburne and Maximilien Robespierre invariably incite the ignorant, propertyless proletariat into a loud chorus of "Kill the King!", making a desperate attempt to divert their eyes from the collapse of economic governance.

〓戦後 日本を占領した屑のアメリカ民主党政権(ハリー·トルーマン：1945〜1953)は､第1次五カ年計画(1928年〜1932年)でKulaks(富農､クラーク)を潰し､コルホーズによる集団化を強行したソ連共産党のスターリンの猿真似をして日本で農地解放を強行し､マルクス·レーニン主義の労働価値説を象徴する耕作者所有原則を導入､日本版コルホーズである農業協同組合により自作農を統制した｡

〓屑のアメリカ民主党政権の農地解放によって誕生した小規模な自作農は､農協から高価な農業機械や農業資材を売り付けられ借金漬けにされる一方､食管制度の美名の下に生産物を農協の言い値で独占的に買い上げられた｡

〓要するに､“自作農”とは名ばかりで､実際には従来の地主(ブルジョア階級)に代わって日本版コルホーズである農協の支配を甘受する事実上の“小作農あるいは農奴”としての地位に甘んじて来たのである｡

《English Translation》

〓The trash Democrat administration in the U.S. that occupied Japan after WWII (Harry S. Truman: 1945–1953) mimicked Stalin and the Soviet Communist Party—who crushed the Kulaks (wealthy farmers) during the First Five-Year Plan (1928–1932) and enforced collectivization via kolkhozes—by forcing agricultural land reform upon Japan. They introduced the cultivator-ownership principle, which symbolizes the Marxist-Leninist labor theory of value, and controlled owner-farmers through Agricultural Cooperatives, which served as the Japanese version of kolkhozes.

〓The small-scale owner-farmers created by the land reform of the trash U.S. Democrat administration were burdened with debt as expensive agricultural machinery and supplies were forced upon them by Agricultural Cooperatives. Meanwhile, under the pretense of the Food Control System, their crops were monopolistically purchased at prices dictated by those very cooperatives.

〓In short, they were "owner-farmers" in name only; in reality, they settled for a status that was effectively no different from "tenant farmers or serfs," accepting the rule of Agricultural Cooperatives—the Japanese version of kolkhozes—which had simply replaced the traditional landlords (the bourgeois class).

https://gyazo.com/cc4c0fff456bb9f63ca47d9b461b816d

〓社会的分業が大原則であり､所有と経営の分離が徹底している近代市民国家(西側先進国)の事業会社では､オーナーである株主に事業会社の日常業務が課されることはない｡

〓オーナーである株主ばかりか経営者に事業会社の日常業務が課されることもない｡

〓それはオーナーである株主が会社経営や日常業務まで課されれば､それぞれの分野における生産性が低下してしまうという自明の理に基づくものである｡

〓ところが福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』､すなわち無知蒙昧な無産階級こそ“世の中の主役”と買い被るマルクス共産主義者は､労働価値説のドグマに陥った挙げ句､事業会社の日常業務､すなわちブルー·カラー労働こそ世の中で最も価値あるものだから､無知蒙昧なブルー·カラー労働者こそ事業会社のオーナーになるべきだなどと絵空事を並べる｡

〓決まり切ったルーティーンとして､食って､寝て､女のケツを追っ掛けて子作りに励み､あとは劣等財(安値コピー製品)や極普通のコモディティー(農産物)を生産することしか能の無い無知蒙昧な無産階級､ブルー·カラー労働者､すなわち福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』｡

〓上役に刷り込まれた通りに決まり切ったルーティーンをこなすしか能の無い無知蒙昧な無産階級､ブルー·カラー労働者が事業会社を効率的に運営するとか､事業会社のオーナー(株主)となってリスク·マネーや現物を出資し､イノベーション(技術革新)によって真新しい正常財を生み出すことなど思い寄らぬことである｡

〓無知蒙昧な無産階級こそ“世の中の主役”であり､『物が安く手に入るのは労働者階級､無産階級の利益』と決め付け､ミクロ的な価格破壊と慢性的不況を招くマクロ的なデフレ政策を強行すれば､経済は痩せ細り､①旧ソ連·東欧圏の国有企業やコルホーズ､支那の人民公社､②五月革命(1968年)後のフランス第5共和国､③小泉·竹中·加藤寛の低能未熟大学3馬鹿トリオによる価格破壊構造改革が齎した『平成デフレ日本の失われた30年』のように自滅の道を辿るしか無くなるのである｡

〓戦後 日本を占領した屑のアメリカ民主党政権(ハリー·トルーマン：1945〜1953)は､第1次五カ年計画(1928年〜1932年)でKulaks(富農､クラーク)を潰し､コルホーズによる集団化を強行したソ連共産党のスターリンの猿真似をして日本で農地解放を強行し､マルクス·レーニン主義の労働価値説を象徴する耕作者所有原則を導入､日本版コルホーズである農業協同組合により自作農を統制した｡

〓また第1次五カ年計画(1928年〜1932年)におけるスターリンのNEPマン潰しを手本に財閥解体を強行した｡

〓旧ソ連共産党のコルホーズを手本としたJA(農協)は､正に決まり切ったルーティーンとして､食って､寝て､女のケツを追っ掛けて子作りに励み､あとは極普通のコモディティー(農産物)を生産することしか能の無い無知蒙昧な無産階級､ブルー·カラー労働者(元小作農)､すなわち福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』に事業会社としてのJA(農協)への出資や経営を行わせる無謀な試みであった｡

〓それに輪を掛けて､農地法に基づく農業委員会なる不明朗な組織が存在し､これまた極普通のコモディティー(農産物)を生産することしか能の無い無知蒙昧な無産階級､ブルー·カラー労働者(元小作農)､すなわち福沢諭吉翁の言うところの『丁稚の権助』が農業委員として､地域内の農地の売買や賃貸借のみならず､宅地の使途にまで許認可権限を濫用する実態が放置されている｡

〓屑のアメリカ民主党政権(ハリー·トルーマン：1945〜1953)は､地主(ブルジョア階級)から半強制的に農地を巻き上げ､マルクス·レーニン主義の労働価値説に基づき非効率極まりない耕作者所有原則を強制したのである｡

〓屑のアメリカ民主党の本質は『ミニ·ソ連共産党』乃至『ミニ中国共産党』に他ならない｡

〓社会的分業によって効率性を追求するのが大原則であり､所有と経営の分離が徹底している近代市民国家(西側先進国)の事業会社とは正に正反対のマルクス·レーニン主義に基づく非効率極まりない農政が戦後80年間も日本国内で温存されて来たのである｡

〓その結果､2025年3月期に大手金融グループが過去最高益やそれに近い利益を計上する中、非効率極まりないJA(農協)グループの農林中金だけが1兆8,000億円もの最終赤字を抱えることになり､下位の信農連や末端のJA(農協)に安易な追加出資を要請する無様な経営実態を世間に曝け出した｡

＞In business corporations of modern civil states (Western advanced countries), where the social division of labor is the fundamental principle and the separation of ownership and management is thoroughly implemented, the owners—the shareholders—are never burdened with the day-to-day operations of the company.

＞Not only the owners (shareholders) but even the managers are not charged with the routine daily operations of the business corporation.

＞This is based on the self-evident truth that if the owners (shareholders) were also burdened with company management and daily operations, productivity in each respective field would decline.

＞Yet the Marxist-Communists, who overestimate what Fukuzawa Yukichi called “the apprentice Gonosuke”—that is, the ignorant and benighted propertyless class—as “the protagonists of the world,” fall into the dogma of the labor theory of value and then spin fantasies claiming that the daily operations of a business corporation (i.e., blue-collar labor) are the most valuable thing in the world, and therefore that the ignorant and benighted blue-collar workers themselves ought to become the owners of business corporations.

＞The ignorant and benighted propertyless class, the blue-collar workers—what Fukuzawa Yukichi called “the apprentice Gonosuke”—who are capable of nothing more than the fixed routines of eating, sleeping, chasing after women to make babies, and producing inferior goods (cheap copy products) or ordinary commodities (agricultural products).

＞It is unthinkable that these ignorant and benighted propertyless people, blue-collar workers who can do nothing more than carry out the fixed routines drilled into them by their superiors, could efficiently manage a business corporation, or become its owners (shareholders), supply risk capital or physical assets, and create brand-new normal goods through innovation (technological progress).

＞If one decrees that the ignorant and benighted propertyless class are “the protagonists of the world,” that “cheap goods benefit the working class and the propertyless,” and then forces through micro-level price destruction and macro-level deflationary policies that invite chronic depression, the economy can only wither away and follow the path of self-destruction seen in: (1) the state-owned enterprises and kolkhozes of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, and the people’s communes of China; (2) the French Fifth Republic after the May 1968 Revolution; and (3) the “Lost 30 Years of Heisei Deflation Japan” brought about by the price-destroying structural reforms of the low-ability, immature university trio of Koizumi, Takenaka, and Kato Hiroshi.

＞The worthless American Democratic administration that occupied Japan after the war (Harry Truman: 1945–1953), aping Stalin of the Soviet Communist Party who crushed the kulaks and forcibly collectivized agriculture under kolkhozes during the First Five-Year Plan (1928–1932), forced through land reform in Japan, introduced the cultivator-ownership principle that symbolizes the Marxist-Leninist labor theory of value, and controlled independent farmers through the Japanese version of the kolkhoz—the agricultural cooperatives (JA).

It also forced through the dissolution of the zaibatsu, modeling itself on Stalin’s crushing of the NEP men during the First Five-Year Plan (1928–1932).

＞The JA (agricultural cooperatives), modeled on the kolkhozes of the old Soviet Communist Party, was precisely a reckless attempt to have the ignorant and benighted propertyless class, blue-collar workers (former tenant farmers)—what Fukuzawa Yukichi called “the apprentice Gonosuke”—who are capable of nothing more than the fixed routines of eating, sleeping, chasing after women to make babies, and producing ordinary commodities (agricultural products), provide capital to and manage JA as a business corporation.